References In Text
References in Text
Section 507 of the International Maritime Satellite Telecommunications Act, referred to in subsec. (c), is [section 507 of Pub. L. 87–624] which was classified to [section 756 of Title 47], Telecommunications, prior to repeal by [Pub. L. 103–414, title III, § 304(b)(5)], Oct. 25, 1994, [108 Stat. 4298].
Amendments
Amendments
2013—Subsecs. (d), (e). [Pub. L. 112–239] redesignated subsec. (e) as (d) and struck out former subsec. (d) which related to biennial reports on the Global Positioning System.
2009—Subsec. (d)(1). [Pub. L. 111–84, § 1032(a)(1)], in introductory provisions, substituted “the Deputy Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Transportation, in their capacity as co-chairs of the National Executive Committee for Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing,” for “the Secretary of Defense” and “the Committees on Armed Services and Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committees on Armed Services, Energy and Commerce, and Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives” for “the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives”.
Subsec. (d)(1)(B)(ii). [Pub. L. 111–84, § 1032(b)], inserted “validated” before “performance requirements” and “in accordance with Office of Management and Budget Circular A–109” after “Plan”.
Subsec. (d)(2). [Pub. L. 111–84, § 1032(a)(2)], added par. (2) and struck out former par. (2), which read as follows: “In preparing the parts of each such report required under subparagraphs (C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Commerce, and the Secretary of Transportation.”
2003—Subsec. (d)(1)(C). [Pub. L. 108–136, § 914(a)(1)], (2), redesignated subpar. (D) as (C) and struck out former subpar. (C) which read as follows: “The most recent determination by the President regarding continued use of the selective availability feature of the system and the expected date of any change or elimination of the use of that feature.”
Subsec. (d)(1)(D). [Pub. L. 108–136, § 914(a)(3)], redesignated subpar. (E) as (D) and substituted “Progress and challenges in” for “Any progress made toward”. Former subpar. (D) redesignated (C).
Subsec. (d)(1)(E). [Pub. L. 108–136, § 914(a)(4)], added subpar. (E). Former subpar. (E) redesignated (D).
Subsec. (d)(1)(F). [Pub. L. 108–136, § 914(a)(4)], added subpar. (F) and struck out former subpar. (F) which read as follows: “Any progress made toward protecting GPS from disruption and interference.”
Subsec. (d)(2). [Pub. L. 108–136, § 914(b)], inserted “(C),” after “under subparagraphs”.
1999—Subsec. (d)(1). [Pub. L. 106–65] substituted “and the Committee on Armed Services” for “and the Committee on National Security” in introductory provisions.
Miscellaneous
Limitation on Construction on United States Territory of Satellite Positioning Ground Monitoring Stations of Foreign Governments
[Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title XVI, § 1602(b)], Dec. 26, 2013, [127 Stat. 943], provided that:“(1) Certification.—“(A)In general.—The President may not authorize or permit the construction of a global navigation satellite system ground monitoring station directly or indirectly controlled by a foreign government (including a ground monitoring station owned, operated, or controlled on behalf of a foreign government) in the territory of the United States unless the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence jointly certify to the appropriate congressional committees that such ground monitoring station will not possess the capability or potential to be used for the purpose of gathering intelligence in the United States or improving any foreign weapon system.“(B)Form.—Each certification under subparagraph (A) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.“(2)National security waiver.—The Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence may jointly waive the certification requirement in paragraph (1) for a ground monitoring station if—“(A) the Secretary and the Director jointly determine that the waiver is in the vital interests of the national security of the United States; and“(B) the Secretary and the Director ensure that—“(i) all data collected or transmitted from ground monitoring stations covered by the waiver are not encrypted;“(ii) all persons involved in the construction, operation, and maintenance of such ground monitoring stations are United States persons;“(iii) such ground monitoring stations are not located in geographic proximity to sensitive United States national security sites;“(iv) the United States approves all equipment to be located at such ground monitoring stations;“(v) appropriate actions are taken to ensure that any such ground monitoring stations do not pose a cyber espionage or other threat, including intelligence or counterintelligence, to the national security of the United States; and“(vi) any improvements to such ground monitoring stations do not reduce or compete with the advantages of Global Positioning System technology for users.“(3)Waiver report.—For each waiver under paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report containing—“(A) the reason why it is not possible to provide the certification under paragraph (1) for the ground monitoring stations covered by such waiver;“(B) an assessment of the impact of the exercise of authority under paragraph (2) with respect to such ground monitoring stations on the national security of the United States;“(C) a description of the means to be used to mitigate any such impact to the United States for the duration that such ground monitoring stations are operated in the territory of the United States; and“(D) any other information in connection with the waiver that the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the Secretary of State, consider appropriate.“(4)Notice.—Not later than 30 days before the exercise of the authority to waive under paragraph (2) the certification requirement under paragraph (1) for a ground monitoring station, the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly provide to the appropriate congressional committees notice of the exercise of such authority and the report required under paragraph (3) with respect to such ground monitoring station.“(5)Appropriate congressional committees defined.—In this subsection, the term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means—“(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and“(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.“(6)Sunset.—Effective on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 26, 2013], paragraphs (1) through (5) are repealed.”
Use of Funds for Global Positioning System
[Pub. L. 112–10, div. A, title VIII, § 8068], Apr. 15, 2011, [125 Stat. 73], provided that: “Funds available to the Department of Defense for the Global Positioning System during the current fiscal year, and hereafter, may be used to fund civil requirements associated with the satellite and ground control segments of such system’s modernization program.”
Limitation on Use of Funds for Purchasing Global Positioning System User Equipment
[Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title IX, § 913], Jan. 7, 2011, [124 Stat. 4328], provided that:“(a)In General.—Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act or any other Act for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to purchase user equipment for the Global Positioning System during fiscal years after fiscal year 2017 unless the equipment is capable of receiving the military code (commonly known as the ‘M code’) from the Global Positioning System.“(b)Exception.—The limitation under subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to the purchase of passenger vehicles or commercial vehicles in which Global Positioning System equipment is installed.“(c)Waiver.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation under subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that—“(1) suitable user equipment capable of receiving the military code from the Global Positioning System is not available; or“(2) with respect to a purchase of user equipment, the Department of Defense does not require that user equipment to be capable of receiving the military code from the Global Positioning System.”
Authorization of Interagency Support for Global Positioning System
[Pub. L. 106–405, § 8], Nov. 1, 2000, [114 Stat. 1753], as amended by [Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title IX, § 911], Oct. 17, 2006, [120 Stat. 2354], provided that: “The use of multi-agency funding and other forms of support is hereby authorized for the functions and activities of the following organizations established pursuant to the United States Space-Based Position, Navigation, and Timing Policy issued December 8, 2004 (and any successor organization, to the extent the successor organization performs the functions of the specified organization):“(1) The interagency committee known as the National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Executive Committee.“(2) The support office for the committee specified in paragraph (1) known as the National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Coordination Office.“(3) The Federal advisory committee known as the National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Advisory Board.”
Enhanced Global Positioning System Program
[Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title II, § 218], Oct. 17, 1998, [112 Stat. 1951], provided that:“(a)Policy on Priority for Development of Enhanced GPS System.—The development of an enhanced Global Positioning System is an urgent national security priority.“(b)Development Required.—To fulfill the requirements described in section 279(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 ([Public Law 104–106]; [110 Stat. 243]) [set out as a note below] and [section 2281 of title 10], United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall develop an enhanced Global Positioning System in accordance with the priority declared in subsection (a). The enhanced Global Positioning System shall include the following elements:“(1) An evolved satellite system that includes increased signal power and other improvements such as regional-level directional signal enhancements.“(2) Enhanced receivers and user equipment that are capable of providing military users with direct access to encrypted Global Positioning System signals.“(3) To the extent funded by the Secretary of Transportation, additional civil frequencies and other enhancements for civil users.“(c)Sense of Congress Regarding Funding.—It is the sense of Congress that—“(1) the Secretary of Defense should ensure that the future-years defense program provides for sufficient funding to develop and deploy an enhanced Global Positioning System in accordance with the priority declared in subsection (a); and“(2) the Secretary of Transportation should provide sufficient funding to support additional civil frequencies for the Global Positioning System and other enhancements of the system for civil users.“(d)Plan for Development of Enhanced Global Positioning System.—Not later than April 15, 1999, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a plan for carrying out the requirements of subsection (b).“(e)Delayed Effective Date for Limitation on Procurement of Systems Not GPS-Equipped.—[Amended [section 152(b) of Pub. L. 103–160], set out as a note below.]“(f)Funding From Authorized Appropriations for Fiscal Year 1999.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated under section 201(3) [[112 Stat. 1946]], $44,000,000 shall be available to establish and carry out an enhanced Global Positioning System program.”
Sustainment and Operation of Global Positioning System
[Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title X, § 1074(a)], (b), Nov. 18, 1997, [111 Stat. 1907], provided that:“(a)Findings.—Congress makes the following findings:“(1) The Global Positioning System (consisting of a constellation of satellites and associated facilities capable of providing users on earth with a highly precise statement of their location on earth) makes significant contributions to the attainment of the national security and foreign policy goals of the United States, the safety and efficiency of international transportation, and the economic growth, trade, and productivity of the United States.“(2) The infrastructure for the Global Positioning System (including both space and ground segments of the infrastructure) is vital to the effectiveness of United States and allied military forces and to the protection of the national security interests of the United States.“(3) In addition to having military uses, the Global Positioning System has essential civil, commercial, and scientific uses.“(4) As a result of the increasing demand of civil, commercial, and scientific users of the Global Positioning System—“(A) there has emerged in the United States a new commercial industry to provide Global Positioning System equipment and related services to the many and varied users of the system; and“(B) there have been rapid technical advancements in Global Positioning System equipment and services that have contributed significantly to reductions in the cost of the Global Positioning System and increases in the technical capabilities and availability of the system for military uses.“(5) It is in the national interest of the United States for the United States—“(A) to support continuation of the multiple-use character of the Global Positioning System;“(B) to promote broader acceptance and use of the Global Positioning System and the technological standards that facilitate expanded use of the system for civil purposes;“(C) to coordinate with other countries to ensure (i) efficient management of the electromagnetic spectrum used by the Global Positioning System, and (ii) protection of that spectrum in order to prevent disruption of signals from the system and interference with that portion of the electromagnetic spectrum used by the system; and“(D) to encourage open access in all international markets to the Global Positioning System and supporting equipment, services, and techniques.“(b)International Cooperation.—Congress urges the President to promote the security of the United States and its allies, the public safety, and commercial interests by taking the following steps:“(1) Undertaking a coordinated effort within the executive branch to seek to establish the Global Positioning System, and augmentations to the system, as a worldwide resource.“(2) Seeking to enter into international agreements to establish signal and service standards that protect the Global Positioning System from disruption and interference.“(3) Undertaking efforts to eliminate any barriers to, and other restrictions of foreign governments on, peaceful uses of the Global Positioning System.“(4) Requiring that any proposed international agreement involving nonmilitary use of the Global Positioning System or any augmentation to the system not be agreed to by the United States unless the proposed agreement has been reviewed by the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Transportation, and the Secretary of Commerce (acting as the Interagency Global Positioning System Executive Board established by Presidential Decision Directive NSTC–6, dated March 28, 1996).”
Access to Global Positioning System
[Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title II, § 279], Feb. 10, 1996, [110 Stat. 243], provided that:“(a)Conditional Prohibition on Use of Selective Availability Feature.—Except as provided in subsection (b), after May 1, 1996, the Secretary of Defense may not (through use of the feature known as ‘selective availability’) deny access of non-Department of Defense users to the full capabilities of the Global Positioning System.“(b)Plan.—Subsection (a) shall cease to apply upon submission by the Secretary of Defense to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on National Security of the House of Representatives of a plan for enhancement of the Global Positioning System that provides for—“(1) development and acquisition of effective capabilities to deny hostile military forces the ability to use the Global Positioning System without hindering the ability of United States military forces and civil users to have access to and use of the system, together with a specific date by which those capabilities could be operational; and“(2) development and acquisition of receivers for the Global Positioning System and other techniques for weapons and weapon systems that provide substantially improved resistance to jamming and other forms of electronic interference or disruption, together with a specific date by which those receivers and other techniques could be operational with United States military forces.”
Limitation on Procurement of Systems Not GPS-Equipped
[Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title I, § 152(b)], Nov. 30, 1993, [107 Stat. 1578], as amended by [Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title II, § 218(e)], Oct. 17, 1998, [112 Stat. 1952]; [Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title II, § 260(a)], Jan. 6, 2006, [119 Stat. 3185], provided that: “After September 30, 2007, funds may not be obligated to modify or procure any Department of Defense aircraft, ship, armored vehicle, or indirect-fire weapon system that is not equipped with a Global Positioning System receiver.”
[[Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title II, § 260(b)], Jan. 6, 2006, [119 Stat. 3186], provided that: “The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending [section 152(b) of Pub. L. 103–160], set out above] shall be deemed to have taken effect at the close of September 30, 2005, and any obligation or expenditure of funds by the Department of Defense during the period beginning on October 1, 2005, and ending on the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. 6, 2006] to modify or procure a Department of Defense aircraft, ship, armored vehicle, or indirect-fire weapon system that is not equipped with a Global Positioning System receiver is hereby ratified with respect to the provision of law specified in subsection (a).”
]
