Prior Provisions
Prior Provisions
A prior section 221 was renumbered [section 226 of this title].
Amendments
Amendments
1992—[Pub. L. 102–484] renumbered [section 114a of this title] as this section, amended section catchline generally, and substituted “future-years” for “multiyear” wherever appearing in text.
1990—[Pub. L. 101–510, § 1402(a)(3)(A)], which directed amendment of section catchline by substituting “Multiyear” for “Five-year”, was executed by substituting “Multiyear” for “Five-Year” as the probable intent of Congress.
Subsec. (a). [Pub. L. 101–510, § 1402(a)(1)], (2), substituted “a multiyear” for “the current five-year” and inserted at end “Any such multiyear defense program shall cover the fiscal year with respect to which the budget is submitted and at least the four succeeding fiscal years.”
Subsecs. (b)(2)(A), (c). [Pub. L. 101–510, § 1402(a)(2)(A)], substituted “multiyear” for “five-year”.
Miscellaneous
Budget Documentation Requirement
[Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title II, § 213(c)], Dec. 26, 2013, [127 Stat. 704], provided that: “In the budget materials submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense in connection with the submission to Congress, pursuant to [section 1105 of title 31], United States Code, of the budget for fiscal year 2015, and each subsequent fiscal year, the Secretary shall include individual project lines for each program segment of the unmanned carrier-launched surveillance and strike system, within program element 0604404N, that articulate all costs, contractual actions, and other information associated with technology development for each such program segment.”
Evaluation and Assessment of the Distributed Common Ground System
[Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title II, § 219], Dec. 26, 2013, [127 Stat. 708], provided that:“(a)Project Codes for Budget Submissions.—In the budget submitted by the President to Congress under [section 1105 of title 31], United States Code, for fiscal year 2015 and each subsequent fiscal year, each capability component within the distributed common ground system program shall be set forth as a separate project code within the program element line, and each covered official shall submit supporting justification for the project code within the program element descriptive summary.“(b) Analysis.—“(1)Requirement.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall conduct an analysis of capability components that are compliant with the intelligence community data standards and could be used to meet the requirements of the distributed common ground system program.“(2)Elements.—The analysis required under paragraph (1) shall include the following:“(A) Revalidation of the distributed common ground system program requirements based on current program needs, recent operational experience, and the requirement for nonproprietary solutions that adhere to open-architecture principles.“(B) Market research of current commercially available tools to determine whether any such tools could potentially satisfy the requirements described in subparagraph (A).“(C) Analysis of the competitive acquisition options for any tools identified in subparagraph (B).“(3)Submission.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 26, 2013], the Under Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees [Committees on Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives] the results of the analysis conducted under paragraph (1).“(c)Covered Official Defined.—In this section, the term ‘covered official’ means the following:“(1) The Secretary of the Army, with respect to matters concerning the Army.“(2) The Secretary of the Navy, with respect to matters concerning the Navy.“(3) The Secretary of the Air Force, with respect to matters concerning the Air Force.“(4) The Commandant of the Marine Corps, with respect to matters concerning the Marine Corps.“(5) The Commander of the United States Special Operations Command, with respect to matters concerning the United States Special Operations Command.”
Consolidated Budget Justification Display for Aerospace Control Alert Mission
[Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title III, § 352(a)], Jan. 2, 2013, [126 Stat. 1701], provided that: “The Secretary of Defense shall establish a consolidated budget justification display that fully identifies the baseline aerospace control alert budget for each of the military services and encompasses all programs and activities of the aerospace control alert mission for each of the following functions:“(1) Procurement.“(2) Operation and maintenance.“(3) Research, development, testing, and evaluation.“(4) Military construction.”
Budget Justification Documents; Budget for Full-Spectrum Military Cyberspace Operations
[Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, § 1079(c)], Jan. 2, 2013, [126 Stat. 1959], provided that: “The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees [Committees on Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives] dedicated budget documentation materials to accompany the budget submissions for fiscal year 2015 and each subsequent fiscal year, including a single Department of Defense-wide budget estimate and detailed budget planning data for full-spectrum military cyberspace operations. Such materials shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex.”
Separate Procurement Line Item for Certain Littoral Combat Ship Mission Modules
[Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title I, § 122], Dec. 31, 2011, [125 Stat. 1319], provided that:“(a)In General.—In the budget materials submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense in connection with the submission to Congress, pursuant to [section 1105 of title 31], United States Code, of the budget for fiscal year 2013, and each subsequent fiscal year, the Secretary shall ensure that a separate, dedicated procurement line item is designated for each covered module that includes the quantity and cost of each such module requested.“(b)Form.—The Secretary shall ensure that any classified components of covered modules not included in a procurement line item under subsection (a) shall be included in a classified annex.“(c)Covered Module.—In this section, the term ‘covered module’ means, with respect to mission modules of the Littoral Combat Ship, the following modules:“(1) Surface warfare.“(2) Mine countermeasures.“(3) Anti-submarine warfare.”
Display of Procurement of Equipment for the Reserve Components of the Armed Forces Under Estimated Expenditures for Procurement in Future-Years Defense Programs
[Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title X, § 1003A], Dec. 31, 2011, [125 Stat. 1556], provided that: “Each future-years defense program submitted to Congress under [section 221 of title 10], United States Code, shall, in setting forth estimated expenditures and item quantities for procurement for the Armed Forces for the fiscal years covered by such program, display separately under such estimated expenditures and item quantities the estimated expenditures for each such fiscal year for equipment for each reserve component of the Armed Forces that will receive items in any fiscal year covered by such program.”
Display of Annual Budget Requirements for Organizational Clothing and Individual Equipment
[Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title X, § 1094], Dec. 31, 2011, [125 Stat. 1607], provided that:“(a)Submission With Annual Budget Justification Documents.—For fiscal year 2013 and each subsequent fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the President, for inclusion with the budget materials submitted to Congress under [section 1105(a) of title 31], United States Code, a budget justification display that covers all programs and activities associated with the procurement of organizational clothing and individual equipment.“(b)Requirements for Budget Display.—The budget justification display under subsection (a) for a fiscal year shall include the following:“(1) The funding requirements in each budget activity and for each Armed Force for organizational clothing and individual equipment.“(2) The amount in the budget for each of the Armed Forces for organizational clothing and equipment for that fiscal year.“(c)Definition.—In this section, the term ‘organizational clothing and individual equipment’ means an item of organizational clothing or equipment prescribed for wear or use with the uniform.”
Separate Program Elements Required for Research and Development of Joint Light Tactical Vehicle
[Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title II, § 213], Jan. 7, 2011, [124 Stat. 4163], provided that: “In the budget materials submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense in connection with the submission to Congress, pursuant to [section 1105 of title 31], United States Code, of the budget for fiscal year 2012, and each subsequent fiscal year, the Secretary shall ensure that within each research, development, test, and evaluation account of the Army and the Navy a separate, dedicated program element is assigned to the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle.”
Separate Procurement Line Item for Body Armor
[Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title I, § 141(b)], Oct. 28, 2009, [123 Stat. 2223], provided that: “In the budget materials submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense in connection with the submission to Congress, pursuant to [section 1105 of title 31], United States Code, of the budget for fiscal year 2011, and each subsequent fiscal year, the Secretary shall ensure that within each military department procurement account, a separate, dedicated procurement line item is designated for body armor.”
Separate Program Elements Required for Research and Development of Individual Body Armor and Associated Components
[Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title II, § 216], Oct. 28, 2009, [123 Stat. 2227], provided that: “In the budget materials submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense in connection with the submission to Congress, pursuant to [section 1105 of title 31], United States Code, of the budget for fiscal year 2011, and each subsequent fiscal year, the Secretary shall ensure that within each research, development, test, and evaluation account of each military department a separate, dedicated program element is assigned to the research and development of individual body armor and associated components.”
Separate Procurement and Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation Line Items and Program Elements for the F–35B and F–35C Joint Strike Fighter Aircraft
[Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title II, § 217], Oct. 28, 2009, [123 Stat. 2228], provided that: “In the budget materials submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense in connection with the submission to Congress, pursuant to [section 1105 of title 31], United States Code, of the budget for fiscal year 2011, and each subsequent fiscal year, the Secretary shall ensure that within the Navy research, development, test, and evaluation account and the Navy aircraft procurement account, a separate, dedicated line item and program element is assigned to each of the F-35B aircraft and the F-35C aircraft, to the extent that such accounts include funding for each such aircraft.”
Guidance on Budget Justification Materials Describing Funding Requested for Operation, Sustainment, Modernization, and Personnel of Major Ranges and Test Facilities
[Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title II, § 220], Oct. 28, 2009, [123 Stat. 2229], provided that:“(a)Guidance on Budget Justification Materials.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) and the Director of the Department of Defense Test Resource Management Center, shall issue guidance clarifying and standardizing the information required in budget justification materials describing amounts to be requested in the budget of the President for a fiscal year (as submitted to Congress pursuant to [section 1105(a) of title 31], United States Code) for funding for each facility and resource of the Major Range and Test Facility Base in connection with each of the following:“(1) Operation.“(2) Sustainment.“(3) Investment and modernization.“(4) Government personnel.“(5) Contractor personnel.“(b)Applicability.—The guidance issued under subsection (a) shall apply with respect to budgets of the President for fiscal years after fiscal year 2010.“(c)Major Range and Test Facility Base Defined.—In this section, the term ‘Major Range and Test Facility Base’ has the meaning given that term in [section 196(h) of title 10], United States Code.”
Military Munitions Response Program and Installation Restoration Program
[Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title III, § 318(b)], Oct. 28, 2009, [123 Stat. 2250], provided that: “As part of the annual budget submission of the Secretary of Defense to Congress, the Secretary shall include the funding levels requested for the Military Munitions Response Program and the Installation Restoration Program.”
Separate Procurement Line Items for Future Combat Systems Program
[Pub. L. 110–417], [div. A], title I, § 111, Oct. 14, 2008, [122 Stat. 4373], provided that: “Effective for the budget of the President submitted to Congress under [section 1105(a) of title 31], United States Code, for fiscal year 2011 and for each fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that a separate, dedicated procurement line item is designated for each of the following elements of the Future Combat Systems program (in this section referred to as ‘FCS’), to the extent the budget includes funding for such elements:“(1) FCS Manned Ground Vehicles.“(2) FCS Unmanned Ground Vehicles.“(3) FCS Unmanned Aerial Systems.“(4) FCS Unattended Ground Systems.“(5) Other FCS elements.”
Separate Procurement and Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation Line Items and Program Elements for Sky Warrior Unmanned Aerial Systems Project
[Pub. L. 110–417], [div. A], title II, § 214, Oct. 14, 2008, [122 Stat. 4386], provided that: “Effective for fiscal year 2010 and for each fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that, in the annual budget submission of the Department of Defense to the President, within both the account for procurement and the account for research, development, test, and evaluation, a separate, dedicated line item and program element is designated for the Sky Warrior Unmanned Aerial Systems project, to the extent such accounts include funding for such project.”
Display of Annual Budget Requirements for Air Sovereignty Alert Mission
[Pub. L. 110–417], [div. A], title III, § 354, Oct. 14, 2008, [122 Stat. 4426], provided that:“(a)Submission With Annual Budget Justification Documents.—For fiscal year 2010 and each subsequent fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the President, for consideration by the President for inclusion with the budget materials submitted to Congress under [section 1105(a) of title 31], United States Code, a consolidated budget justification display that covers all programs and activities of the Air Sovereignty Alert mission of the Air Force.“(b)Requirements for Budget Display.—The budget display under subsection (a) for a fiscal year shall include for such fiscal year the following:“(1) The funding requirements for the Air Sovereignty Alert mission, and the associated Command and Control mission, including such requirements for—“(A) military personnel costs;“(B) flying hours; and“(C) any other associated mission costs.“(2) The amount in the budget for the Air Force for each of the items referred to in paragraph (1).“(3) The amount in the budget for the Air National Guard for each such item.”
Requirement for Separate Display of Budgets for Afghanistan and Iraq
[Pub. L. 110–417], [div. A], title XV, § 1502, Oct. 14, 2008, [122 Stat. 4649], provided that:“(a)Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.—In any annual or supplemental budget request for the Department of Defense that is submitted to Congress after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 14, 2008], the Secretary of Defense shall set forth separately any funding requested in such budget request for—“(1) operations of the Department of Defense in Afghanistan; and“(2) operations of the Department of Defense in Iraq.“(b)Specificity of Display.—Each budget request covered by subsection (a) shall, for any funding requested for operations in Iraq or Afghanistan—“(1) clearly display the amount of such funding at the appropriation account level and at the program, project, or activity level; and“(2) include a detailed description of the assumptions underlying the funding for the period covered by the budget request, including the anticipated troop levels, the operations intended to be carried out, and the equipment reset requirements necessary to support such operations.”
Report on Funding of the Department of Defense for Health Care
[Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title VII, § 718], Jan. 28, 2008, [122 Stat. 197], provided that:“(a)Report.—If the President submits to Congress the budget for a fiscal year under [section 1105 of title 31], United States Code, and the aggregate amount included in that budget for the Department of Defense for health care for such fiscal year is less than the aggregate amount provided by Congress for the Department for health care for the preceding fiscal year, and, in the case of the Department, the total allocation from the Defense Health Program to any military department is less than the total of such allocation in the preceding fiscal year, the President shall submit to Congress a report on—“(1) the reasons for the determination that inclusion of a lesser aggregate amount or allocation to any military department is in the national interest; and“(2) the anticipated effects of the inclusion of such lesser aggregate amount or allocation to any military department on the access to and delivery of medical and support services to members of the Armed Forces and their family members.“(b)Termination.—The section shall not be in effect after December 31, 2017.”
Specification of Amounts Requested for Procurement of Contract Services
[Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title VIII, § 806], Jan. 28, 2008, [122 Stat. 213], which required that materials submitted to Congress in support of the Defense Department budget identify clearly and separately the amounts requested in each budget account for procurement of contract services, was repealed and restated as [section 235 of this title] by [Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title VIII, § 803(a)(1)], (3), Oct. 28, 2009, [123 Stat. 2402].
Report on Major Department of Defense Headquarters Activities Personnel
[Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title IX, § 901(b)], (c), Jan. 28, 2008, [122 Stat. 272], which required that the Secretary of Defense include a report with the defense budget materials for each fiscal year concerning the number of military personnel and civilian employees of the Department of Defense assigned to major headquarters activities for each component of the Department, any increase in personnel assigned to major headquarters activities attributable to certain reasons, and any cost savings associated with the elimination of contracts for the performance of major headquarters activities, was repealed by [Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XI, § 1109(b)(3)], Oct. 28, 2009, [123 Stat. 2493].
Major Force Program Category for Space
[Pub. L. 112–10, div. A, title VIII, § 8092], Apr. 15, 2011, [125 Stat. 77], provided that: “The Secretary of Defense shall create a major force program category for space for each future-years defense program of the Department of Defense submitted to Congress under [section 221 of title 10], United States Code, during fiscal year 2011. The Secretary of Defense shall designate an official in the Office of the Secretary of Defense to provide overall supervision of the preparation and justification of program recommendations and budget proposals to be included in such major force program category.”
Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:
[Pub. L. 111–118, div. A, title VIII, § 8099], Dec. 19, 2009, [123 Stat. 3450].
[Pub. L. 110–329, div. C, title VIII, § 8104], Sept. 30, 2008, [122 Stat. 3644].
[Pub. L. 110–116, div. A, title VIII, § 8111], Nov. 13, 2007, [121 Stat. 1339].
Request for Funds for Ongoing Military Operation Overseas
[Pub. L. 110–116, div. A, title VIII, § 8116], Nov. 13, 2007, [121 Stat. 1340], provided that: “Any request for funds for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2008 for an ongoing military operation overseas, including operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, shall be included in the annual budget of the President for such fiscal year as submitted to Congress under [section 1105(a) of title 31], United States Code.”
Annual Report on Personnel Security Investigations for Industry and National Industrial Security Program
[Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title III, § 347(a)], (b), Oct. 17, 2006, [120 Stat. 2158], which required that the Secretary of Defense include in budget justification documents for each fiscal year a report on future requirements of the Department of Defense concerning Personnel Security Investigations for Industry and the National Industrial Security Program of the Defense Security Service, was repealed by [Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title X, § 1062(d)(1)], Dec. 31, 2011, [125 Stat. 1585].
Budgeting for Ongoing Military Operations in Afghanistan and Iraq
[Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title X, § 1008], Oct. 17, 2006, [120 Stat. 2374], provided that: “The President’s budget submitted to Congress pursuant to [section 1105(a) of title 31], United States Code, for each fiscal year after fiscal year 2007 shall include—“(1) a request for the appropriation of funds for such fiscal year for ongoing military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq;“(2) an estimate of all funds expected to be required in that fiscal year for such operations; and“(3) a detailed justification of the funds requested.”
Separate Program Elements Required for Significant Systems Development and Demonstration Projects for Armored Systems Modernization Program
[Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title II, § 214], Jan. 6, 2006, [119 Stat. 3168], provided that:“(a)Program Elements Specified.—Effective for the budget of the President submitted to Congress under [section 1105(a) of title 31], United States Code, for fiscal year 2008 and each fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that a separate, dedicated program element is assigned to each of the following systems development and demonstration projects of the Armored Systems Modernization program:“(1) Manned Ground Vehicles.“(2) Systems of Systems Engineering and Program Management.“(3) Future Combat Systems Reconnaissance Platforms and Sensors.“(4) Future Combat Systems Unmanned Ground Vehicles.“(5) Unattended Sensors.“(6) Sustainment.“(b)Early Commencement of Display in Budget Justification Materials.—As part of the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Defense budget for fiscal year 2007, as submitted with the budget of the President under such section 1105(a), the Secretary of the Army shall set forth the budget justification material for the systems development and demonstration projects of the Armored Systems Modernization program identified in subsection (a) as if the projects were already separate program elements.“(c) Technology Insertion to Current Force.—“(1)Report on establishment of additional program element.—Not later than June 1, 2006, the Secretary of the Army shall submit a report to the congressional defense committees [Committees on Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives] describing the manner in which the costs of integrating Future Combat Systems capabilities into current force programs could be assigned to a separate, dedicated program element and any management issues that would be raised as a result of establishing such a program element.“(2)Display in budget justification materials.—As part of the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Defense budget for fiscal year 2007 and each fiscal year thereafter, as submitted with the budget of the President under such section 1105(a), the Secretary of the Army shall set forth the budget justification material for technology insertion to the current force under the Armored Systems Modernization program.”
Annual Submission of Information Regarding Information Technology Capital Assets
[Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title III, § 351], Dec. 2, 2002, [116 Stat. 2516], as amended by [Pub. L. 110–417], [div. A], title X, § 1051, Oct. 14, 2008, [122 Stat. 4604]; [Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title III, § 333], Dec. 26, 2013, [127 Stat. 739], provided that:“(a)Requirement To Submit Information.—Not later than 30 days after the date on which the President submits the budget for a fiscal year to Congress pursuant to [section 1105 of title 31], United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress information on the following information technology capital assets, including information technology capital assets that are a national security system, of the Department of Defense:“(1) Information technology capital assets that have an estimated total cost for the fiscal year for which the budget is submitted (as computed in fiscal year 2000 constant dollars) in excess of $32,000,000 or an estimated total cost for the future-years defense program for which the budget is submitted (as computed in fiscal year 2000 constant dollars) in excess of $378,000,000, for all expenditures, for all increments, regardless of the appropriation and fund source, directly related to the assets definition, design, development, deployment, sustainment, and disposal.“(2) Information technology capital assets not covered by paragraph (1) that have been determined by the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense to be significant investments.“(b)Required Information For High-Threshold Assets.—With respect to each information technology capital asset described in subsection (a)(1), the Secretary of Defense shall include the following information:“(1) The name and identifying acronym of the information technology capital asset.“(2) The date of initiation of the asset.“(3) A summary of performance measurements and metrics.“(4) The total amount of funds, by appropriation account, appropriated and obligated for prior fiscal years, with a specific breakout of such information for the two preceding fiscal years.“(5) The funds, by appropriation account, requested for the next fiscal year.“(6) The name of each prime contractor and the work to be performed.“(7) Program management and management oversight information.“(8) The original baseline cost and most current baseline information.“(9) Information regarding compliance with the provisions of law enacted or amended by the Government Performance Results Act of 1993 ([Public Law 103–62]; [107 Stat. 285]) [see Short Title of 1993 Amendment note under [31 U.S.C. 1101]] and the Clinger–Cohen Act of 1996 (divisions D and E of [Public Law 104–106]; [110 Stat. 642]) [§§ 5001–5703 and §§ 4001–4402, see Tables for classification].“(c)Required Information for Significant Investments.—With respect to each information technology capital asset not covered by paragraph (1) of subsection (a), but covered by paragraph (2) of that subsection, the Secretary of Defense shall include such information in a format that is appropriate to the current status of such asset.“(d)Total Cost Determinations.—In estimating the total cost for a fiscal year or total cost of an information technology capital asset, the Secretary of Defense shall consider research and development costs, procurement costs, and operation and maintenance costs related to the information technology capital asset.“(e)Definitions.—In this section:“(1) The term ‘information technology’ has the meaning given that term in [section 11101 of title 40], United States Code.“(2) The term ‘capital asset’ has the meaning given that term in Office of Management and Budget Circular A–11.“(3) The term ‘national security system’ has the meaning given that term in [section 11103 of title 40], United States Code.”
Department of Defense Requests for Funds for Environmental Restoration at BRAC Sites in Future Fiscal Years
[Pub. L. 107–249, § 131], Oct. 23, 2002, [116 Stat. 1586], provided that:“(a)Requests for Funds for Environmental Restoration at BRAC Sites in Future Fiscal Years.—In the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Defense budget for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2003, the amount requested for environmental restoration, waste management, and environmental compliance activities in such fiscal year with respect to military installations approved for closure or realignment under the base closure laws shall accurately reflect the anticipated cost of such activities in such fiscal year.“(b)Base Closure Laws Defined.—In this section, the term ‘base closure laws’ means the following:“(1)[Section 2687 of title 10], United States Code.“(2) The Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of [Public Law 101–510]; [10 U.S.C. 2687] note).“(3) Title II of the Defense Authorization Amendments and Base Closure and Realignment Act ([Public Law 100–526]; [10 U.S.C. 2687] note).”
Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation act:
[Pub. L. 107–64, § 131], Nov. 5, 2001, [115 Stat. 482].
Budget Justification Documents for Costs of Armed Forces’ Participation in Contingency Operations
[Pub. L. 107–248, title VIII, § 8132], Oct. 23, 2002, [116 Stat. 1568], provided that: “The budget of the President for fiscal year 2004 submitted to the Congress pursuant to [section 1105 of title 31], United States Code, and each annual budget request thereafter, shall include separate budget justification documents for costs of United States Armed Forces’ participation in contingency operations for the Military Personnel accounts, the Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Fund, the Operation and Maintenance accounts, and the Procurement accounts: Provided, That these budget justification documents shall include a description of the funding requested for each anticipated contingency operation, for each military service, to include active duty and Guard and Reserve components, and for each appropriation account: Provided further, That these documents shall include estimated costs for each element of expense or object class, a reconciliation of increases and decreases for ongoing contingency operations, and programmatic data including, but not limited to troop strength for each active duty and Guard and Reserve component, and estimates of the major weapons systems deployed in support of each contingency: Provided further, That these documents shall include budget exhibits OP–5 and OP–32, as defined in the Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, for the Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Fund for fiscal years 2002 and 2003.”
Similar provisions were contained in the following appropriation acts:
[Pub. L. 113–76, div. C, title VIII, § 8075], Jan. 17, 2014, [128 Stat. 123].
[Pub. L. 113–6, div. C, title VIII, § 8075], Mar. 26, 2013, [127 Stat. 315].
[Pub. L. 112–74, div. A, title VIII, § 8077], Dec. 23, 2011, [125 Stat. 824].
[Pub. L. 112–10, div. A, title VIII, § 8077], Apr. 15, 2011, [125 Stat. 74].
[Pub. L. 111–118, div. A, title VIII, § 8083], Dec. 19, 2009, [123 Stat. 3447].
[Pub. L. 110–329, div. C, title VIII, § 8086], Sept. 30, 2008, [122 Stat. 3641].
[Pub. L. 110–116, div. A, title VIII, § 8091], Nov. 13, 2007, [121 Stat. 1335].
[Pub. L. 109–289, div. A, title VIII, § 8089], Sept. 29, 2006, [120 Stat. 1294].
[Pub. L. 109–148, div. A, title VIII, § 8100], Dec. 30, 2005, [119 Stat. 2721].
[Pub. L. 108–287, title VIII, § 8116], Aug. 5, 2004, [118 Stat. 998].
[Pub. L. 108–87, title VIII, § 8115], Sept. 30, 2003, [117 Stat. 1099].
[Pub. L. 107–117, div. A, title VIII, § 8097], Jan. 10, 2002, [115 Stat. 2268].
[Pub. L. 106–259, title VIII, § 8097], Aug. 9, 2000, [114 Stat. 695].
[Pub. L. 106–79, title VIII, § 8110], Oct. 25, 1999, [113 Stat. 1257].
Budget Submissions on Active and Reserve Military Personnel Accounts
[Pub. L. 105–262, title VIII, § 8093], Oct. 17, 1998, [112 Stat. 2319], provided that: “At the time the President submits his budget for fiscal year 2000 and any fiscal year thereafter, the Department of Defense shall transmit to the congressional defense committees [Committee on Armed Services and Subcommittee on National Security of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and Committee on Armed Services and Subcommittee on Defense of the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate] a budget justification document for the active and reserve Military Personnel accounts, to be known as the ‘M–1’, which shall identify, at the budget activity, activity group, and subactivity group level, the amounts requested by the President to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for military personnel in any budget request, or amended budget request, for that fiscal year.”
Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation act:
[Pub. L. 105–56, title VIII, § 8104], Oct. 8, 1997, [111 Stat. 1243].
Modification of Budget Data Exhibits
[Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title III, § 324(c)], Nov. 18, 1997, [111 Stat. 1678], provided that: “The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) shall ensure that aircraft budget data exhibits of the Department of Defense that are submitted to Congress display total numbers of active aircraft where numbers of primary aircraft or primary authorized aircraft are displayed in those exhibits.”
Inclusion of Air Force Depot Maintenance as Operation and Maintenance Budget Line Items
[Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title III, § 327], Nov. 18, 1997, [111 Stat. 1679], provided that: “For fiscal year 1999 and each fiscal year thereafter, Air Force depot-level maintenance of materiel shall be displayed as one or more separate line items under each subactivity within the authorization request for operation and maintenance, Air Force, in the proposed budget for that fiscal year submitted to Congress pursuant to [section 1105 of title 31], United States Code.”
Identification in President’s Budget of NATO Costs
[Pub. L. 106–79, title VIII, § 8091], Oct. 25, 1999, [113 Stat. 1253], provided that: “The budget of the President for fiscal year 2001 submitted to the Congress pursuant to [section 1105 of title 31], United States Code, and each annual budget request thereafter, shall include budget activity groups (known as ‘subactivities’) in all appropriations accounts provided in this Act [see Tables for classification], as may be necessary, to separately identify all costs incurred by the Department of Defense to support the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and all Partnership For Peace programs and initiatives. The budget justification materials submitted to the Congress in support of the budget of the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2001, and subsequent fiscal years, shall provide complete, detailed estimates for all such costs.”
Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:
[Pub. L. 105–262, title VIII, § 8095], Oct. 17, 1998, [112 Stat. 2319].
[Pub. L. 105–56, title VIII, § 8116], Oct. 8, 1997, [111 Stat. 1245].
Program Elements for Ballistic Missile Defense Organization
[Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title II, § 251], Feb. 10, 1996, [110 Stat. 233], which required that in budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of Department of Defense budget, the amount requested for activities of the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization be set forth in accordance with specified program elements, was repealed and restated as [section 223 of this title] by [Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title II, § 235(a)(1)], (b), Oct. 17, 1998, [112 Stat. 1953].
Budget Submissions on Salaries and Expenses Related to Administrative Activities
[Pub. L. 109–148, div. A, title VIII, § 8032], Dec. 30, 2005, [119 Stat. 2705], provided that: “The President shall include with each budget for a fiscal year submitted to the Congress under [section 1105 of title 31], United States Code, and hereafter, materials that shall identify clearly and separately the amounts requested in the budget for appropriation for that fiscal year for salaries and expenses related to administrative activities of the Department of Defense, the military departments, and the defense agencies.”
Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:
[Pub. L. 108–287, title VIII, § 8036], Aug. 5, 2004, [118 Stat. 978].
[Pub. L. 108–87, title VIII, § 8036], Sept. 30, 2003, [117 Stat. 1080].
[Pub. L. 107–248, title VIII, § 8036], Oct. 23, 2002, [116 Stat. 1544].
[Pub. L. 107–117, div. A, title VIII, § 8039], Jan. 10, 2002, [115 Stat. 2256].
[Pub. L. 106–259, title VIII, § 8039], Aug. 9, 2000, [114 Stat. 683].
[Pub. L. 106–79, title VIII, § 8042], Oct. 25, 1999, [113 Stat. 1240].
[Pub. L. 105–262, title VIII, § 8042], Oct. 17, 1998, [112 Stat. 2306].
[Pub. L. 105–56, title VIII, § 8046], Oct. 8, 1997, [111 Stat. 1231].
[Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, § 101(b)] [title VIII, § 8047], Sept. 30, 1996, [110 Stat. 3009–71], 3009–98.
[Pub. L. 104–61, title VIII, § 8058], Dec. 1, 1995, [109 Stat. 663].
[Pub. L. 103–335, title VIII, § 8069], Sept. 30, 1994, [108 Stat. 2635].
[Pub. L. 103–139, title VIII, § 8082], Nov. 11, 1993, [107 Stat. 1458].
[Pub. L. 102–396, title IX, § 9132], Oct. 6, 1992, [106 Stat. 1936].
Submission of Multiyear Defense Program
[Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XIV, § 1402(b)], Nov. 5, 1990, [104 Stat. 1674], provided for limitations on obligation by Secretary of Defense of fiscal year 1991 advance procurement funds if, as of end of 90-day period beginning on date on which President’s budget for fiscal year 1992 was submitted to Congress, the Secretary had not submitted to Congress fiscal year 1992 multiyear defense program.
Mission Oriented Presentation of Department of Defense Matters in Budget
[Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XIV, § 1404], Nov. 5, 1990, [104 Stat. 1675], directed President to submit with budget submitted to Congress each year of programs of Department of Defense, a budget that organizes programs within major functional category 050 (National Defense) on basis of major roles and missions of Department of Defense, prior to repeal by [Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title X, § 1002(b)], Oct. 23, 1992, [106 Stat. 2480]. See [section 222 of this title].
